|Vince's treatment of the poor, students, the disabled, crime|
victims, the elderly deserves better than this.
In an interview that was little more than a rather unprofessional attempt to brush it all under the carpet, Cable argued that losing the triple-A rating was not so important. Suggesting that it was merely "symbolic" he described it as "background noise."
Interesting then that he has been part of a government that has justified extremely severe cuts in public services, including the massive hike in fees for university students that he promised he would never vote for, in order to save the AAA rating. Perhaps Cable could tell everyone when the retention of the rating changed from being "vital" and used as the justification for huge waves of cuts, to being "symbolic" and "background noise."
Will he now campaign to pay back those students who have taken on huge loans, will he now campaign to pay back those disabled people who have had their benefits removed, plunging them into poverty, further illness and in some cases death? Will he campaign to get EMA restored so that those young people languishing without either jobs, education or training can have their futures back?
Justifying cuts on the basis of retaining the AAA-rating was part of his government's excuse for;
- slashing social services,
- lengthening NHS waiting lists,
- privatising hospitals,
- removing EMAs from the poorest students,
- closing Sure Start centres.
- making tens of thousands of people homeless by cutting housing benefit
- cutting police numbers
- cutting the pay of millions of public sector workers
- forcing millions into dead-end jobs on poverty wages
- forcing the unemployed into 'workfare' slavery schemes, which actually cost jobs
- imposing a 'granny tax'
- flatlining the economy and driving down productivity
- plunging hundered of thousands of more children into poverty